Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:35:19AM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> > This series is a respin of the RFC proposed by Paul Renauld (renauld@xxxxxxxxxx)
> > and Brendan Jackman (jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx) [1]
> >
> > # Performance improvement
> >
> > With this patch-set some syscalls with lots of LSM hooks in their path
> > benefitted at an average of ~3% and I/O and Pipe based system calls benefitting
> > the most.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> With the merge window closed now, can we please land this in -next so we
> can get any glitches found/hammered out with maximal time before the
> next merge window?

It's in the queue, I've been swamped lately as you'll likely notice I
haven't really had a chance to process patches yet during this cycle.

We've also been over this soo many times that I've lost count - you
know this is on my list, I've mentioned it multiple times that this is
now high on the todo list, and your continued nagging does nothing
other than make me want to look at other patches first.  You're not
helping your cause Kees.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux