On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:32 PM Hou Tao <houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > OK. I will postpone the change, but I still think posting a RFC for > discussion may also benefit the generalization of bpf_ma in slub, andI > could do that later. Yeah. RFC is always fine. > > Please prioritize qp-trie. It's more urgent. > > At LPC multiple folks requested a good data structure to store > > variable length objects. > > . > > OK. Will do qp-trie first. Could you elaborate one possible use case for > the "variable length objects" thing ? I hope strings are just a subset of "variable length things" that qp-trie can hold.
