[PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: test wire_len/gso_segs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Make sure we can pass arbitrary data in wire_len/gso_segs.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
index a2eb8db8dafb..edf5e8c7d400 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		.cb[4] = 5,
 		.priority = 6,
 		.tstamp = 7,
+		.wire_len = 100,
+		.gso_segs = 8,
 	};
 	struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
 		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
index 2a9f4c736ebc..534fbf9a7344 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
@@ -18,5 +18,10 @@ int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	skb->priority++;
 	skb->tstamp++;
 
+	if (skb->wire_len != 100)
+		return 1;
+	if (skb->gso_segs != 8)
+		return 1;
+
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.24.0.525.g8f36a354ae-goog




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux