On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:56 AM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I hit the following failure when running selftests with
> internal backported upstream kernel:
> test_ksyms:PASS:kallsyms_fopen 0 nsec
> test_ksyms:FAIL:ksym_find symbol 'bpf_link_fops' not found
> #123 ksyms:FAIL
>
> In /proc/kallsyms, we have
> $ cat /proc/kallsyms | grep bpf_link_fops
> ffffffff829f0cb0 d bpf_link_fops.llvm.12608678492448798416
> The CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN is enabled in the kernel which is responsible
> for bpf_link_fops.llvm.12608678492448798416 symbol name.
>
> In prog_tests/ksyms.c we have
> kallsyms_find("bpf_link_fops", &link_fops_addr)
> and kallsyms_find() compares "bpf_link_fops" with symbols
> in /proc/kallsyms in order to find the entry. With
> bpf_link_fops.llvm.<hash> in /proc/kallsyms, the kallsyms_find()
> failed.
>
> To fix the issue, in kallsyms_find(), if a symbol has suffix
> .llvm.<hash>, that suffix will be ignored for comparison.
> This fixed the test failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> index 70e29f316fe7..dc871e642ed5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
> @@ -221,6 +221,18 @@ int kallsyms_find(const char *sym, unsigned long long *addr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> while (fscanf(f, "%llx %c %499s%*[^\n]\n", &value, &type, name) > 0) {
> + /* If CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN is enabled, static variable/function
> + * symbols could be promoted to global due to cross-file inlining.
> + * For such cases, clang compiler will add .llvm.<hash> suffix
> + * to those symbols to avoid potential naming conflict.
> + * Let us ignore .llvm.<hash> suffix during symbol comparison.
> + */
> + if (type == 'd') {
> + char *res = strstr(name, ".llvm.");
I declared this variable at the top of the function to remove this
empty line (and renamed it to "match"), applied to bpf-next, thanks!
> +
> + if (res)
> + *res = '\0';
> + }
> if (strcmp(name, sym) == 0) {
> *addr = value;
> goto out;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
