Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 4:02 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:17:16PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Switch all BPF linker code dealing with iterating BTF type ID and string
> > offset fields to new btf_field_iter facilities.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > index 0d4be829551b..be6539e59cf6 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
> > @@ -957,19 +957,35 @@ static int check_btf_str_off(__u32 *str_off, void *ctx)
> >  static int linker_sanity_check_btf(struct src_obj *obj)
> >  {
> >       struct btf_type *t;
> > -     int i, n, err = 0;
> > +     int i, n, err;
> >
> >       if (!obj->btf)
> >               return 0;
> >
> >       n = btf__type_cnt(obj->btf);
> >       for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
> > +             struct btf_field_iter it;
> > +             __u32 *type_id, *str_off;
> > +             const char *s;
> > +
> >               t = btf_type_by_id(obj->btf, i);
> >
> > -             err = err ?: btf_type_visit_type_ids(t, check_btf_type_id, obj->btf);
> > -             err = err ?: btf_type_visit_str_offs(t, check_btf_str_off, obj->btf);
> > +             err = btf_field_iter_init(&it, t, BTF_FIELD_ITER_IDS);
> >               if (err)
> >                       return err;
> > +             while ((type_id = btf_field_iter_next(&it))) {
> > +                     if (*type_id >= n)
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             err = btf_field_iter_init(&it, t, BTF_FIELD_ITER_STRS);
> > +             if (err)
> > +                     return err;
> > +             while ((str_off = btf_field_iter_next(&it))) {
> > +                     s = btf__str_by_offset(obj->btf, *str_off);
> > +                     if (!s)
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
>
> nit, we could drop 's' and just do (!btf__str_by_offset(obj->btf, *str_off))
>

yep, we could, but I probably won't resubmit just for this. So if
something else comes up I'll clean this up, but it can go in as is
just as well, IMO.

>
> otherwise the patchset lgtm
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>

thanks for taking a look!

>
> jirka
>
> > +             }
> >       }
> >
> >       return 0;
> > @@ -2234,26 +2250,10 @@ static int linker_fixup_btf(struct src_obj *obj)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
>
> SNIP





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux