On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:04 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2024-05-31 13:25:14 [+0200], Jiri Olsa wrote: > > ah there's also CONFIG_KPROBE=n > > > > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c is enabled with CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS, > > which has: > > > > depends on BPF_SYSCALL > > depends on (KPROBE_EVENTS || UPROBE_EVENTS) && PERF_EVENTS > > > > so I think we chould combine both like below > > Yes, this would work. Makes sense to me as well. Pls respin.