Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 4/9] selftests/bpf: extend distilled BTF tests to cover BTF relocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 13:24 +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
> Ensure relocated BTF looks as expected; in this case identical to
> original split BTF, with a few duplicate anonymous types added to
> split BTF by the relocation process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I think we now need a few test cases with types that have duplicate names.
Wdyt?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux