On Fri, 24 May 2024 22:37:11 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Instead of iterating through the entire fgraph_array[] and seeing if one
> of the bitmap bits are set to know to call the array's retfunc() function,
> use for_each_set_bit() on the bitmap itself. This will only iterate for
> the number of set bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> index 4d503b3e45ad..5e8e13ffcfb6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> @@ -827,11 +827,10 @@ static unsigned long __ftrace_return_to_handler(struct fgraph_ret_regs *ret_regs
> #endif
>
> bitmap = get_bitmap_bits(current, offset);
> - for (i = 0; i < FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE; i++) {
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, sizeof(bitmap) * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
> struct fgraph_ops *gops = fgraph_array[i];
>
> - if (!(bitmap & BIT(i)))
> - continue;
> if (gops == &fgraph_stub)
Ah, nit: maybe this is unlikely()?
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
