Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, docs: clarify sign extension of 64-bit use of 32-bit imm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 20 May 2024 14:52:55 -0700 you wrote:
> imm is defined as a 32-bit signed integer.
> 
> {MOV, K, ALU64} says it does "dst = src" (where src is 'imm') and it
> does do dst = (s64)imm, which in that sense does sign extend imm. The MOVSX
> instruction is explained as sign extending, so added the example of
> {MOV, K, ALU64} to make this more clear.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, docs: clarify sign extension of 64-bit use of 32-bit imm
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4e1215d9a190

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux