On 5/21/24 3:51 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
+static __poll_t bpf_link_poll(struct file *file, struct poll_table_struct *pts) +{ + struct bpf_link *link = file->private_data; + + if (link->ops->poll) + return link->ops->poll(file, pts); + + return 0;
The current bpf_link_fops.poll is NULL before this patch. From vfs_poll, it seems to be DEFAULT_POLLMASK for this case. Please double check.
+} + static const struct file_operations bpf_link_fops = { #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS .show_fdinfo = bpf_link_show_fdinfo, @@ -3157,6 +3167,7 @@ static const struct file_operations bpf_link_fops = { .release = bpf_link_release, .read = bpf_dummy_read, .write = bpf_dummy_write, + .poll = bpf_link_poll,
Same here. What does the epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_ADD) currently expect for link (e.g. cgroup) that does not support poll?
};