get_pid_task() internally already calls rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), so there is no point to do this one extra time. This is a drive-by improvements and has no correctness implications. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 1baaeb9ca205..6249dac61701 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -3423,9 +3423,7 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr } if (pid) { - rcu_read_lock(); task = get_pid_task(find_vpid(pid), PIDTYPE_TGID); - rcu_read_unlock(); if (!task) { err = -ESRCH; goto error_path_put; -- 2.43.0