Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] Fix and improvement for bpf_sysctl_set_new_value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 2:14 AM Raman Shukhau <ramasha@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Changes v1 => v2:
> 1. corrected copyright comments
> 2. unsigned int for sysctl name to prevent build test error:
>    "R2 min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'"

CI disagrees. Same failure in test_progs-no_alu32

42: (18) r3 = 0xffffa5bd00dd5014 ;
R3_w=map_value(map=cgrp_sys.rodata,ks=4,vs=152,off=20)
44: (85) call bpf_strncmp#182
R2 min value is negative, either use unsigned or 'var &= const'

pw-bot: cr





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux