Re: [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] libbpf: move non-public APIs from libbpf.h to libbpf_internal.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:33 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:14:26 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Few libbpf APIs are not public but currently exposed through libbpf.h to be
> > used by bpftool. Move them to libbpf_internal.h, where intent of being
> > non-stable and non-public is much more obvious.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c         |  1 +
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h          | 17 -----------------
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > index 4f52d3151616..d93bee298e54 100644
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/net.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >
> >  #include <bpf.h>
> >  #include <nlattr.h>
> > +#include "libbpf_internal.h"
> >  #include "main.h"
> >  #include "netlink_dumper.h"
>
> I thought this idea was unpopular when proposed?

There was a recent discussion about the need for unstable APIs to be
exposed to bpftool and we concluded that libbpf_internal.h is the most
appropriate place to do this.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux