Good suggestion! I will send a new version.
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:58 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:14:21PM -0700, Yabin Cui wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > index d2a15c0c6f8a..9fc55193ff99 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> > @@ -1240,12 +1240,16 @@ static inline void perf_sample_save_callchain(struct perf_sample_data *data,
> > }
> >
> > static inline void perf_sample_save_raw_data(struct perf_sample_data *data,
> > + struct perf_event *event,
> > struct perf_raw_record *raw)
> > {
> > struct perf_raw_frag *frag = &raw->frag;
> > u32 sum = 0;
> > int size;
> >
> > + if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> Should we add something like:
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data->sample_flags & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW))
> return;
>
> ? And I suppose the same for all these other patches.
>
> > do {
> > sum += frag->size;
> > if (perf_raw_frag_last(frag))
>
>
