Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] bpftool: support displaying raw split BTF using base BTF section as base

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] bpftool: support displaying raw split BTF using base BTF section as base
From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:57:20 +0100
Cc: eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx, mykolal@xxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, nathan@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240510103052.850012-5-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

2024-05-10 11:31 UTC+0100 ~ Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
> If no base BTF can be found, fall back to checking for the .BTF.base
> section and use it to display split BTF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: support resilient split BTF
  - From: Alan Maguire
- [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] bpftool: support displaying raw split BTF using base BTF section as base
  - From: Alan Maguire

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf v3] powerpc/bpf: enforce full ordering for ATOMIC operations with BPF_FETCH
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/11] bpftool: support displaying relocated-with-base split BTF
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] bpftool: support displaying raw split BTF using base BTF section as base
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/11] selftests/bpf: extend distilled BTF tests to cover BTF relocation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]