Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Mon, 6 May 2024 17:13:28 -0700 you wrote:
> Fix yet another case of mishandling SEC("struct_ops") programs that were
> nulled out programmatically through BPF skeleton by the user.
>
> While at it, add some improvements around detecting and reporting errors,
> specifically a common case of declaring SEC("struct_ops") program, but
> forgetting to actually make use of it by setting it as a callback
> implementation in SEC(".struct_ops") variable (i.e., map) declaration.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/7] libbpf: remove unnecessary struct_ops prog validity check
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8374b56b1df5
- [bpf-next,2/7] libbpf: handle yet another corner case of nulling out struct_ops program
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e18e2e70dbd1
- [bpf-next,3/7] selftests/bpf: add another struct_ops callback use case test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9d66d60e968d
- [bpf-next,4/7] libbpf: fix libbpf_strerror_r() handling unknown errors
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/548c2ede0dc8
- [bpf-next,5/7] libbpf: improve early detection of doomed-to-fail BPF program loading
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c78420bafe7c
- [bpf-next,6/7] selftests/bpf: validate struct_ops early failure detection logic
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/41df0733ea41
- [bpf-next,7/7] selftests/bpf: shorten subtest names for struct_ops_module test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7b9959b8cdbc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
