> On 5/7/24 7:05 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: >> The BPF selftest verifier_global_subprogs.c contains code that >> purposedly performs out of bounds access to memory, to check whether >> the kernel verifier is able to catch them. For example: >> >> __noinline int global_unsupp(const int *mem) >> { >> if (!mem) >> return 0; >> return mem[100]; /* BOOM */ >> } >> >> With -O1 and higher and no inlining, GCC notices this fact and emits a >> "maybe uninitialized" warning. This is by design. Note that the >> emission of these warnings is highly dependent on the precise >> optimizations that are performed. > > Interesting. The error message is 'maybe uninitialized' but not > an error to complain out-of-bound access. But anyway, since gcc > produces a warning, your patch silences it and LGTM. > > Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> Please hold on. The right warning to inhibit is -Wmaybe-uninitialized, which is GCC specific. So it must be: #if !defined(__clang__) #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmaybe-uninitialized" #endif Unless you disagree I am testing this and will send a V2 with your Acked-by. Sorry about this. I hate to be erratic, but so many small patches today. >> >> This patch adds a compiler pragma to verifier_global_subprogs.c to >> ignore these warnings. >> >> Tested in bpf-next master. >> No regressions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: david.faust@xxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: cupertino.miranda@xxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git >> a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c >> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c >> index baff5ffe9405..d05dc218b7e9 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_global_subprogs.c >> @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ >> #include "xdp_metadata.h" >> #include "bpf_kfuncs.h" >> +/* The compiler may be able to detect the access to uninitialized >> + memory in the routines performing out of bound memory accesses and >> + emit warnings about it. This is the case of GCC. */ >> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wuninitialized" >> + >> int arr[1]; >> int unkn_idx; >> const volatile bool call_dead_subprog = false;