On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 22:24, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ringbuf_process_ring() return int64_t, while ring__consume_n() assigns
> it to int. It's highly unlikely, but possible for ringbuf_process_ring()
> to return value larger than INT_MAX, so use int64_t. ring__consume_n()
> does check INT_MAX before returning int result to the user.
>
> Fixes: 4d22ea94ea33 ("libbpf: Add ring__consume_n / ring_buffer__consume_n")
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>
