Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2024-04-29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:16:33 +0200 Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> > Could you follow up to remove this header?
> > Having to keep multiple headers in sync is annoying, and using
> > 'make headers' or including in-tree headers directly is not rocket
> > science.  
> 
> Just because I am curious, what was the reason/history behind the
> tools/include directory to start with? Most headers seem to be copies
> there.

I think it started as folks copying a handful of headers for perf tool
and snowballed from there. By the time I pulled this the copy of
ethtool.h was already out of date. So is if_xdp.h, BTW, as I am
reminded every time I built networking selftests. 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux