On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:20 PM I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In the origin implementation in function bbr_update_ack_aggregation(),
> we utilize a lambda expression to flip the bit value of
> bbr->extra_acked_win_idx. Since the data type of
> bbr->extra_acked_win_idx is simply a single bit, we are actually trying
> to perform a bit flip operation, under the fact we can simply perform a
> bitwise not operation on bbr->extra_acked_win_idx.
>
> This way we can elimate the need of possible branches which generate by
> the lambda function, they could result in branch misses sometimes.
> Perform a bitwise not operation is more straightforward and wouldn't
> generate branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
> index 146792cd2..75068ba25 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
> @@ -829,8 +829,7 @@ static void bbr_update_ack_aggregation(struct sock *sk,
> bbr->extra_acked_win_rtts + 1);
> if (bbr->extra_acked_win_rtts >= bbr_extra_acked_win_rtts) {
> bbr->extra_acked_win_rtts = 0;
> - bbr->extra_acked_win_idx = bbr->extra_acked_win_idx ?
> - 0 : 1;
> + bbr->extra_acked_win_idx = ~(bbr->extra_acked_win_idx);
> bbr->extra_acked[bbr->extra_acked_win_idx] = 0;
> }
> }
Or
bbr->extra_acked_win_idx ^= 1;
Note that C compilers generate the same code, for the 3 variants.
They do not generate branches for something simple like this.
