Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:50:39 -0700
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240424054526.8031-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com>


On 4/23/24 10:45 PM, Haiyue Wang wrote:

The commit d56b63cf0c0f ("bpf: add support for bpf_wq user type")
changes the fields support number to 11, just sync the comment.

Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@xxxxxxxxx>


Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX
  - From: Haiyue Wang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add a few more options for GCC_BPF in selftests/bpf/Makefile
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] Objpool performance improvements
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux