Test case dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value passes NULL as the first
parameter of the test_1() function. Mark this parameter as nullable to
make verifier aware of such possibility.
Otherwise, NULL check in the test_1() code:
SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
int BPF_PROG(test_1, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state)
{
if (!state)
return ...;
... access state ...
}
Might be removed by verifier, thus triggering NULL pointer dereference
under certain conditions.
Reported-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jemarch@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
index 25b75844891a..8f413cdfd91a 100644
--- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
+++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
{
}
-static int bpf_dummy_test_1(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb)
+static int bpf_dummy_ops__test_1(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb__nullable)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_test_sleepable(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb)
}
static struct bpf_dummy_ops __bpf_bpf_dummy_ops = {
- .test_1 = bpf_dummy_test_1,
+ .test_1 = bpf_dummy_ops__test_1,
.test_2 = bpf_dummy_test_2,
.test_sleepable = bpf_dummy_test_sleepable,
};
--
2.34.1
