[PATCH 6.6 063/158] perf lock contention: Add a missing NULL check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit f3408580bac8ce5cd76e7391e529c0a22e7c7eb2 ]

I got a report for a failure in BPF verifier on a recent kernel with
perf lock contention command.  It checks task->sighand->siglock without
checking if sighand is NULL or not.  Let's add one.

  ; if (&curr->sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
  265: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +2624)     ; frame1: R0_w=trusted_ptr_task_struct(off=0,imm=0)
                                        ;         R1_w=rcu_ptr_or_null_sighand_struct(off=0,imm=0)
  266: (b7) r2 = 0                      ; frame1: R2_w=0
  267: (0f) r1 += r2
  R1 pointer arithmetic on rcu_ptr_or_null_ prohibited, null-check it first
  processed 164 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 15 peak_states 15 mark_read 5
  -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
  libbpf: prog 'contention_end': failed to load: -13
  libbpf: failed to load object 'lock_contention_bpf'
  libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'lock_contention_bpf': -13
  Failed to load lock-contention BPF skeleton
  lock contention BPF setup failed
  lock contention did not detect any lock contention

Fixes: 1811e82767dcc ("perf lock contention: Track and show siglock with address")
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409225542.1870999-1-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
index 8d3cfbb3cc65b..473106c72c695 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ static inline __u32 check_lock_type(__u64 lock, __u32 flags)
 	struct task_struct *curr;
 	struct mm_struct___old *mm_old;
 	struct mm_struct___new *mm_new;
+	struct sighand_struct *sighand;
 
 	switch (flags) {
 	case LCB_F_READ:  /* rwsem */
@@ -259,7 +260,9 @@ static inline __u32 check_lock_type(__u64 lock, __u32 flags)
 		break;
 	case LCB_F_SPIN:  /* spinlock */
 		curr = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
-		if (&curr->sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
+		sighand = curr->sighand;
+
+		if (sighand && &sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
 			return LCD_F_SIGHAND_LOCK;
 		break;
 	default:
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux