Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf/verifier: refactor checks for range computation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:37 +0100, Cupertino Miranda wrote:

[...]

> I was proud of the initial boolean implementation that was very clean
> and simple, although like Yonghong said, not truly a refactor.
> If everyone agrees that it is Ok, I will be happy to change it back.

Hi Miranda,

I've talked to Yonghong today, he is ok with removing distinction between
__mark_reg_unknown and mark_reg_unknown, but he asks to first make a patch,
that replaces the use of mark_reg_unknown() by __mark_reg_unknown().
So that the follow-up refactoring patch would not change any behaviour.
What do you think?

Best regards,
Eduard





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux