On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 10:37 +0100, Cupertino Miranda wrote: [...] > I was proud of the initial boolean implementation that was very clean > and simple, although like Yonghong said, not truly a refactor. > If everyone agrees that it is Ok, I will be happy to change it back. Hi Miranda, I've talked to Yonghong today, he is ok with removing distinction between __mark_reg_unknown and mark_reg_unknown, but he asks to first make a patch, that replaces the use of mark_reg_unknown() by __mark_reg_unknown(). So that the follow-up refactoring patch would not change any behaviour. What do you think? Best regards, Eduard
