Hi Masami, On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300 > Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for > > code. > > > > Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be > > enabled in non-modular kernels. > > > > Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside > > modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the > > dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES. > > Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4. > Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in > function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should > not make a problem. I'll rebase and will try to reduce ifdefery where possible. > Thank you, > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/Kconfig | 2 +- > > kernel/kprobes.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 11 ++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
