[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, arm64: Fix incorrect runtime stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>

When __bpf_prog_enter() returns zero, the arm64 register x20 that stores
prog start time is not assigned to zero, causing incorrect runtime stats.

To fix it, assign the return value of bpf_prog_enter() to x20 register
immediately upon its return.

Fixes: efc9909fdce0 ("bpf, arm64: Add bpf trampoline for arm64")
Reported-by: Ivan Babrou <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ivan Babrou <ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 76b91f36c729..cf9a9ebb4cda 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1905,15 +1905,15 @@ static void invoke_bpf_prog(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_link *l,
 
 	emit_call(enter_prog, ctx);
 
+	/* save return value to callee saved register x20 */
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(20), A64_R(0)), ctx);
+
 	/* if (__bpf_prog_enter(prog) == 0)
 	 *         goto skip_exec_of_prog;
 	 */
 	branch = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
 	emit(A64_NOP, ctx);
 
-	/* save return value to callee saved register x20 */
-	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(20), A64_R(0)), ctx);
-
 	emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_R(0), A64_SP, args_off), ctx);
 	if (!p->jited)
 		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(1), (const u64)p->insnsi, ctx);
-- 
2.40.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux