Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 7efd0a74039f Merge tag 'ata-6.9-rc4' of git://git.kernel.o.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1358aeed180000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=285be8dd6baeb438 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a7f061d2d16154538c58 compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-7efd0a74.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/39eb4e17e7f0/vmlinux-7efd0a74.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b9a08c36e0ca/bzImage-7efd0a74.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+a7f061d2d16154538c58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-00355-g7efd0a74039f #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/7645 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807ffd7d58 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_buddy mm/page_alloc.c:2730 [inline] ffff88807ffd7d58 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue mm/page_alloc.c:2911 [inline] ffff88807ffd7d58 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: get_page_from_freelist+0x4b9/0x3780 mm/page_alloc.c:3314 but task is already holding lock: ffff88802c8739f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xc8/0xdd0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:324 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 trie_delete_elem+0xb0/0x7e0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:451 ___bpf_prog_run+0x3e51/0xabd0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997 __bpf_prog_run32+0xc1/0x100 kernel/bpf/core.c:2236 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline] bpf_trace_run2+0x151/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420 __bpf_trace_contention_end+0xca/0x110 include/trace/events/lock.h:122 trace_contention_end.constprop.0+0xea/0x170 include/trace/events/lock.h:122 __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x266/0xc80 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:560 pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:584 [inline] queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51 [inline] queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline] do_raw_spin_lock+0x210/0x2c0 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:116 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x42/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 rmqueue_bulk mm/page_alloc.c:2131 [inline] __rmqueue_pcplist+0x5a8/0x1b00 mm/page_alloc.c:2826 rmqueue_pcplist mm/page_alloc.c:2868 [inline] rmqueue mm/page_alloc.c:2905 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0xbaa/0x3780 mm/page_alloc.c:3314 __alloc_pages+0x22b/0x2460 mm/page_alloc.c:4575 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2175 [inline] allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2338 [inline] new_slab+0xcc/0x3a0 mm/slub.c:2391 ___slab_alloc+0x66d/0x1790 mm/slub.c:3525 __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0xb0 mm/slub.c:3610 __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3663 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3835 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3965 [inline] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x367/0x470 mm/slub.c:3986 kmalloc_reserve+0xef/0x2c0 net/core/skbuff.c:599 __alloc_skb+0x164/0x380 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline] nsim_dev_trap_skb_build drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c:748 [inline] nsim_dev_trap_report drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c:805 [inline] nsim_dev_trap_report_work+0x2a4/0xc80 drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c:850 process_one_work+0x9a9/0x1ac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3254 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3335 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #0 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 rmqueue_buddy mm/page_alloc.c:2730 [inline] rmqueue mm/page_alloc.c:2911 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x4b9/0x3780 mm/page_alloc.c:3314 __alloc_pages+0x22b/0x2460 mm/page_alloc.c:4575 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] __kmalloc_large_node+0x7f/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:3911 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3954 [inline] __kmalloc_node.cold+0x5/0x5f mm/slub.c:3973 kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:648 [inline] bpf_map_kmalloc_node+0x98/0x4a0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:422 lpm_trie_node_alloc kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:291 [inline] trie_update_elem+0x1ef/0xdd0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:333 bpf_map_update_value+0x2c1/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:203 map_update_elem+0x623/0x910 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641 __sys_bpf+0xab9/0x4b40 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5648 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&trie->lock); lock(&zone->lock); lock(&trie->lock); lock(&zone->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor.2/7645: #0: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline] #0: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline] #0: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_map_update_value+0x24b/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:202 #1: ffff88802c8739f8 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xc8/0xdd0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:324 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 7645 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-syzkaller-00355-g7efd0a74039f #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 rmqueue_buddy mm/page_alloc.c:2730 [inline] rmqueue mm/page_alloc.c:2911 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x4b9/0x3780 mm/page_alloc.c:3314 __alloc_pages+0x22b/0x2460 mm/page_alloc.c:4575 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:238 [inline] alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:261 [inline] __kmalloc_large_node+0x7f/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:3911 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3954 [inline] __kmalloc_node.cold+0x5/0x5f mm/slub.c:3973 kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:648 [inline] bpf_map_kmalloc_node+0x98/0x4a0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:422 lpm_trie_node_alloc kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:291 [inline] trie_update_elem+0x1ef/0xdd0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:333 bpf_map_update_value+0x2c1/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:203 map_update_elem+0x623/0x910 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641 __sys_bpf+0xab9/0x4b40 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5648 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fdb1c27de69 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fdb1d0210c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fdb1c3abf80 RCX: 00007fdb1c27de69 RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000020001400 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: 00007fdb1c2ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fdb1c3abf80 R15: 00007ffe7cd30f08 </TASK> loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 512 ext4: Unknown parameter '���������������3;�{\C _r���f�gDZ*��ג�Md�;�s�8)V�Z�-#��S%�SY�E`1tAS�>�>���d]�x��h' --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup
