On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 12:29 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote: [...] > > > Oh, I misunderstood the above statement then. > > The way I read it was: "after this patch access to elements other than > > the first one would be rejected". While this patch explicitly allows > > access to the subsequent array elements, hence confusion. > > Sorry for the noise. > > I will rephrase it to make it more clear. Great, thank you. >
