On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 20:56 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote: [...] > So, I decided not to support rbtree nodes and list nodes. > > However, there are a discussion about looking into fields of struct > types in an outer struct type. So, we will have another patchset to > implement it. Once we have it, we can support the case of gFoo and > all_nodes described earlier. All this makes sense, but in such a case would it make sense to adjust btf_find_datasec_var() to avoid adding BPF_RB_NODE and BPF_LIST_NODE variables with nelem > 1? (Like it does for BPF_TIMER etc).
