On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:30:06AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 06:49:32PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > Thanks for the link ! > > > > Having RO protection as a debug feature would be useful. > > > > I believe we have CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX (and CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) for that already. > > > > Or are we saying we also want to get rid of them ? > > No, in fact I'm working on making that stronger. We currently still have > a few cases that violate the W^X rule. > > The thing is, when the BPF stuff is JIT'ed, the actual BPF instruction > page is not actually executed at all, so making it RO serves no purpose, > other than to fragment the direct map. Yes exactly, in that case it is only used for dumping the BPF insns back to user space and therefore no need at all to set it RO. (The JITed image however *is* set as RO. - Perhaps there was some confusion given your earlier question.) Thanks, Daniel
