Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ftrace: make extra rcu_is_watching() validation check optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  3 Apr 2024 15:03:27 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Introduce CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING config option to
> control whether ftrace low-level code performs additional
> rcu_is_watching()-based validation logic in an attempt to catch noinstr
> violations.
> 
> This check is expected to never be true and is mostly useful for
> low-level validation of ftrace subsystem invariants. For most users it
> should probably be kept disabled to eliminate unnecessary runtime
> overhead.
> 
> This improves BPF multi-kretprobe (relying on ftrace and rethook
> infrastructure) runtime throughput by 2%, according to BPF benchmarks ([0]).
> 
>   [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzauQ2WKMjZdc9s0rBWa01BYbgwHN6aNDXQSHYia47pQ-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 

This looks good to me :)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you,

> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/trace_recursion.h |  2 +-
>  kernel/trace/Kconfig            | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> index d48cd92d2364..24ea8ac049b4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_recursion.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ extern void ftrace_record_recursion(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
>  # define do_ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip)	do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING
>  # define trace_warn_on_no_rcu(ip)					\
>  	({								\
>  		bool __ret = !rcu_is_watching();			\
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> index 61c541c36596..7aebd1b8f93e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> @@ -974,6 +974,19 @@ config FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_SIZE
>  	  This file can be reset, but the limit can not change in
>  	  size at runtime.
>  
> +config FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING
> +	bool "Validate RCU is on during ftrace execution"
> +	depends on FUNCTION_TRACER
> +	depends on ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
> +	help
> +	  All callbacks that attach to the function tracing have some sort of
> +	  protection against recursion. This option is only to verify that
> +	  ftrace (and other users of ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()) are not
> +	  called outside of RCU, as if they are, it can cause a race. But it
> +	  also has a noticeable overhead when enabled.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N
> +
>  config RING_BUFFER_RECORD_RECURSION
>  	bool "Record functions that recurse in the ring buffer"
>  	depends on FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux