On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 1:10 AM Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> cp include/uapi/linux/bpf.h tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> updated in v6
>
> no changes in v5
>
> new in v4
> ---
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index bf80b614c4db..f1890eed213a 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1662,9 +1662,10 @@ union bpf_attr {
> } query;
>
> struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
> - __u64 name;
> - __u32 prog_fd;
> - __aligned_u64 cookie;
> + __u64 name;
> + __u32 prog_fd;
> + __u32 :32;
> + __aligned_u64 cookie;
> } raw_tracepoint;
something wrong with your tree.
there is no such issue in bpf-next.
