On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 7:05 PM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:59 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We will use ebpf/xdp/kfuncs whenever they make sense to us. > > In such case my Nack stands even if you drop this patch. We are not changing any ebpf code. I must have missed the memo that stated you can control how people write or use ebpf. The situation is this: Anybody can write kfuncs today. They can put them in kernel modules - i am sure you designed it with that intent. So what exactly are you objecting to that is ebpf related here? cheers, jamal
