Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() with different maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/1/24 11:16 PM, Philo Lu wrote:
A test is added for bpf_for_each_map_elem() with either an arraymap or a
hashmap.
$ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t for_each
  #93/1    for_each/hash_map:OK
  #93/2    for_each/array_map:OK
  #93/3    for_each/write_map_key:OK
  #93/4    for_each/multi_maps:OK
  #93      for_each:OK
Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c       | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c | 49 ++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_multi_maps.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
index 8963f8a549f2..61c5e064f89c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  #include "for_each_hash_map_elem.skel.h"
  #include "for_each_array_map_elem.skel.h"
  #include "for_each_map_elem_write_key.skel.h"
+#include "for_each_multi_maps.skel.h"
static unsigned int duration; @@ -143,6 +144,70 @@ static void test_write_map_key(void)
  		for_each_map_elem_write_key__destroy(skel);
  }
+static void test_multi_maps(void)
+{
+	struct for_each_multi_maps *skel;
+	__u64 val, array_total, hash_total;
+	__u32 key, max_entries;
+	int i, err;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
+		.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+		.repeat = 1,
+	);
+
+	skel = for_each_multi_maps__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "for_each_multi_maps__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	array_total = 0;
+	/* left last element as empty */
+	max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.arraymap) - 1;

Any particular reason you skip the last element?

+	for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+		key = i;
+		val = i + 1;
+		array_total += val;
+		err = bpf_map__update_elem(skel->maps.arraymap, &key, sizeof(key),
+					   &val, sizeof(val), BPF_ANY);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "array_map_update"))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+	hash_total = 0;
+	max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.hashmap) - 1;

ditto.

+	for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+		key = i + 100;
+		val = i + 1;
+		hash_total += val;
+		err = bpf_map__update_elem(skel->maps.hashmap, &key, sizeof(key),
+					   &val, sizeof(val), BPF_ANY);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "hash_map_update"))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+	skel->bss->data_output = 0;
+	skel->bss->use_array = 1;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access), &topts);
+	if (CHECK(err || topts.retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+		  err, errno, topts.retval))
+		goto out;

Let us use ASSERT_* macros here. In this case, you can do
	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "retval");
There is no need to goto out, we can continue testing below.

+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->data_output, array_total, "array output");
+
+	skel->bss->data_output = 0;
+	skel->bss->use_array = 0;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access), &topts);
+	if (CHECK(err || topts.retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+		  err, errno, topts.retval))
+		goto out;

Do two ASSERT_OK similar to the above.

+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->data_output, hash_total, "hash output");
+
+out:
+	for_each_multi_maps__destroy(skel);
+}
+
[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux