Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Export send_recv_data helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/1/24 11:38 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>

This patch extracts the code to send and receive data into a new
helper named send_recv_data() in network_helpers.c and export it
in network_helpers.h.

This helper will be used for MPTCP BPF selftests.

It is good to see the codes can be reused for the mptcp selftests.

What about the patches for the new mptcp tests? It is not included in this set because it depends on other patches that have not been in the bpf-next yet? It is not mentioned in the cover letter.


Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h |  1 +
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c     | 82 +-----------------
  3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
index f2f8f7388d7c..9878d8072e7f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
@@ -506,3 +506,89 @@ int send_byte(int fd)
  		return -1;
  	return 0;
  }
+
+struct send_recv_arg {
+	int		fd;
+	uint32_t	bytes;
+	int		stop;
+};
+
+static void *send_recv_server(void *arg)
+{
+	struct send_recv_arg *a = (struct send_recv_arg *)arg;
+	ssize_t nr_sent = 0, bytes = 0;
+	char batch[1500];
+	int err = 0, fd;
+
+	fd = accept(a->fd, NULL, NULL);
+	while (fd == -1) {
+		if (errno == EINTR)
+			continue;
+		err = -errno;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	if (settimeo(fd, 0)) {
+		err = -errno;
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	while (bytes < a->bytes && !READ_ONCE(a->stop)) {
+		nr_sent = send(fd, &batch,
+			       MIN(a->bytes - bytes, sizeof(batch)), 0);
+		if (nr_sent == -1 && errno == EINTR)
+			continue;
+		if (nr_sent == -1) {
+			err = -errno;
+			break;
+		}
+		bytes += nr_sent;
+	}
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(bytes, a->bytes, "send");
+
+done:
+	if (fd >= 0)
+		close(fd);
+	if (err) {
+		WRITE_ONCE(a->stop, 1);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+void send_recv_data(int lfd, int fd, uint32_t total_bytes)
+{
+	ssize_t nr_recv = 0, bytes = 0;
+	struct send_recv_arg arg = {
+		.fd	= lfd,
+		.bytes	= total_bytes,
+	};
+	pthread_t srv_thread;
+	void *thread_ret;
+	char batch[1500];
+	int err;
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(arg.stop, 0);

nit. It is not needed now because stop is not a global variable which was reused by multiple tests.

Anyway, it has a conflict with the bpf-next tree and requires a re-spin.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux