On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:38 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:19:33AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > We can still produce per-thread smaller BTFs in parallel, that won't
> > hurt reproducibility. You only need to concatenate them in
> > reproducible order at the very end.
> >
> > Or maybe it's already working like this, not sure, I'm a bit rusty in
> > pahole internals nowadays, sorry :)
>
> Yeah, its just that I didn't get to that point yet, I just stopped here
> to have the parallel reproducible feature working, will continue with
> the parallel BTF part.
Great to hear, thanks, Arnaldo!
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > > diff --git a/pahole.c b/pahole.c
> > > index 96e153432fa212a5..fcb4360f11debeb9 100644
> > > --- a/pahole.c
> > > +++ b/pahole.c
> > > @@ -3173,6 +3173,14 @@ struct thread_data {
> > > struct btf_encoder *encoder;
> > > };
> >
> > [...]
