Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:45:26 -0300
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAADnVQKkEqhdTOxytVbcm1QnBcf4MQ+q4KYaHzsuqkq3r=X-VA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

Em Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:39:28AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Another fix I'm carrying in my perf/core branch,
 
> Why in perf/core?
> I very much prefer all libbpf patches to go via normal route via bpf/net trees.
> We had enough conflicts in this merge window. Let's avoid them.

Humm, if we both carry the same patch the merge process can do its magic
and nobody gets hurt? Besides these are really minor things, no?

- Arnaldo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
  - From: Alexei Starovoitov

References:
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Jakub Kicinski
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix up generation of bpf_helper_defs.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
  - From: Alexei Starovoitov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf/bpftool: Allow to link libbpf dynamically
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]