Re: [PATCH v2] libbpf: use local bpf_helpers.h include

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 8:11 AM Tobias Böhm <tobias@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit 20d59ee55172fdf6 ("libbpf: add bpf_core_cast() macro") added a
> bpf_helpers include in bpf_core_read.h as a system include. Usually, the
> includes are local, though, like in bpf_tracing.h. This commit adjusts
> the include to be local as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Böhm <tobias@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Sorry for the very wrong first version.
>
> Changes to v1:
>   - The patch was based on the libbpf repo instead of the kernel repo.
>   - The description referred to the commit of the wrong repo.
>
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h
> index 1ce738d91..b5c7ce5c2 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  #ifndef __BPF_CORE_READ_H__
>  #define __BPF_CORE_READ_H__
>
> -#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
>

Makes sense, I'll apply the patch. But I wanted to check if this is
causing real issues in practice. Mostly to understand if I need 1.4.1
release with this fix?

>  /*
>   * enum bpf_field_info_kind is passed as a second argument into
>
> base-commit: 026e680b0a08a62b1d948e5a8ca78700bfac0e6e
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux