On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:31 AM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Here's another alternative approach. Like this PATCH v2, it's ok to > initialise tcc as MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, and then decrement it when tailcall > happens. This approach does same with this PATCH v2, and passes all > selftests. > > Here's the diff: before this thread falls through the cracks... Please never post a relative diff from some patch that was in some thread. Always post a diff against the latest bpf or bpf-next _and_ submit it to the list as a full patch with your SOB, etc so that CI can test it and maintainers can review it. When the diff is not in patchwork it will be lost.
