[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix flaky test btf_map_in_map/lookup_update

[Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>]

Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure:

  [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1
  test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
  ...
  test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec
  test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked!
  #33/1    btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL
  #33      btf_map_in_map:FAIL

In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods,
it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space.

But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one
or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual
freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work
is dequeued, the map will be actually freed.
See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c.

By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually
freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed
such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 24 -------------------
 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
index a8b53b8736f0..5d389eb16295 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
@@ -102,30 +102,6 @@ static void test_lookup_update(void)
 	CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
 	CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
 
-	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
-	skel = NULL;
-
-	/* we need to either wait for or force synchronize_rcu(), before
-	 * checking for "still exists" condition, otherwise map could still be
-	 * resolvable by ID, causing false positives.
-	 *
-	 * Older kernels (5.8 and earlier) freed map only after two
-	 * synchronize_rcu()s, so trigger two, to be entirely sure.
-	 */
-	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
-	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
-
-	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
-	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
-		close(fd);
-		goto cleanup;
-	}
-	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
-	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
-		close(fd);
-		goto cleanup;
-	}
-
 cleanup:
 	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
 }
-- 
2.43.0