Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT_* in ns_current_pid_tgid test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/19/24 2:52 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 8:30 AM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3/18/24 4:36 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:48:59AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
Replace CHECK in selftest ns_current_pid_tgid with recommended ASSERT_* style.
I also shortened subtest name as the prefix of subtest name is covered
by the test name already.

This patch does fix a testing issue. Currently even if bss->user_{pid,tgid}
is not correct, the test still passed since the clone func returns 0.
I fixed it to return a non-zero value if bss->user_{pid,tgid} is incorrect.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c      | 36 ++++++++++---------
   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
index 24d493482ffc..3a0664a86243 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c
@@ -20,19 +20,19 @@ static int test_current_pid_tgid(void *args)
   {
      struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid__bss  *bss;
      struct test_ns_current_pid_tgid *skel;
-    int err = -1, duration = 0;
+    int ret = -1, err;
      pid_t tgid, pid;
      struct stat st;

      skel = test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load();
-    if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_load", "failed to load skeleton\n"))
-            goto cleanup;
+    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_ns_current_pid_tgid__open_and_load"))
+            goto out;
you could just return in here so there's no need for the out label
otherwise lgtm
Since this patch intends to just replace CHECK with ASSERT_*.
I tried to keep other parts of codes the same as before. But
I can certainly do this. I will wait for other comments
before sending another revision.

I applied it as is, but feel free to send suggested improvements as a follow up.

Actually the patch (after this commit)
  4d4bd29e363c  selftests/bpf: Refactor out some functions in ns_current_pid_tgid test
already did the refactoring. So I don't need to do anything.



Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>


jirka
[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux