On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:11 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > index e613eebfd349..e61a51a5b4be 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > @@ -2691,3 +2691,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void) > { > return true; > } > + > +u64 bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} Looks good and should work, but s390 CI is still not happy. Ideas? sock tests were not failing before. So something is going on.