Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:47 -0700 you wrote:
> Add ability to specify and retrieve BPF cookie for raw tracepoint programs.
> Both BTF-aware (SEC("tp_btf")) and non-BTF-aware (SEC("raw_tp")) are
> supported, as they are exactly the same at runtime.
>
> This issue recently came up in production use cases, where custom tried to
> switch from slower classic tracepoints to raw tracepoints and ran into this
> limitation. Luckily, it's not that hard to support this for raw_tp programs.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,bpf-next,1/5] bpf: flatten bpf_probe_register call chain
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6b9c2950c912
- [v3,bpf-next,2/5] bpf: pass whole link instead of prog when triggering raw tracepoint
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d4dfc5700e86
- [v3,bpf-next,3/5] bpf: support BPF cookie in raw tracepoint (raw_tp, tp_btf) programs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/68ca5d4eebb8
- [v3,bpf-next,4/5] libbpf: add support for BPF cookie for raw_tp/tp_btf programs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/36ffb2023e37
- [v3,bpf-next,5/5] selftests/bpf: add raw_tp/tp_btf BPF cookie subtests
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/51146ff0fae3
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
