bpf_probe_register() and __bpf_probe_register() have identical
signatures and bpf_probe_register() just redirect to
__bpf_probe_register(). So get rid of this extra function call step to
simplify following the source code.
It has no difference at runtime due to inlining, of course.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 1b041911b1d8..30ecf62f8a17 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(10);
BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(11);
BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(12);
-static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct tracepoint *tp = btp->tp;
@@ -2443,11 +2443,6 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *
prog);
}
-int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- return __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog);
-}
-
int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog);
--
2.43.0
