RE: [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] tools/include: add ethtool_ringparam definition to UAPI header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:04 PM
> To: Vyavahare, Tushar <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx;
> Karlsson, Magnus <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>; Fijalkowski, Maciej
> <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>; jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx;
> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> ast@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sarkar, Tirthendu
> <tirthendu.sarkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] tools/include: add ethtool_ringparam
> definition to UAPI header
> 
> On 03/15, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> > Introduce the definition for ethtool_ringparam in the UAPI header
> > located in the include directory. This is needed by the next patches
> > as they run tests with various ring sizes.
> 
> Any reason not to 'cp {,tools/}include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h' instead?
> Less divergence should be easier to support/understand.

Sure, I will do it.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux