On 03/15, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is a "if (err)" check earlier, so the "if (err < 0)"
> check that this patch removing is unnecessary. It was my overlook
> when making adjustments to the bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline()
> such that the caller does not have to worry about the new page when
> the function returns error.
>
> Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 187e2af05abe ("bpf: struct_ops supports more than one page for trampolines.")
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
