Re: [bpf-next:master 5/7] kernel/bpf/core.c:900:5: warning: '__pte_index_size' is not defined, evaluates to 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I think hard coding is cleaner and less surprising.
> > I'd like to hear what Song thinks about it.
>
> Agreed. Let's just hard code it to 2MiB * num_possible_nodes().
>
> Thanks,
> Song

Here it is: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240311122722.86232-1-puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,
Puranjay




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux