On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:07 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On some architectures like ARM64, PMD_SIZE can be really large in some > configurations. Like with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y the PMD_SIZE is > 512MB. > > Use 2MB * num_possible_nodes() as the upper limit for allocations done > through the prog pack allocator. > > Fixes: ea2babac63d4 ("bpf: Simplify bpf_prog_pack_[size|mask]") > Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7e216c88-77ee-47b8-becc-a0f780868d3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c > index 134b7979f537..83a3b6964e54 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c > @@ -893,8 +893,17 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list); > * CONFIG_MMU=n. Use PAGE_SIZE in these cases. > */ > #ifdef PMD_SIZE > +/* > + * PMD_SIZE is really big for some archs. It doesn't make sense to > + * reserve too much memory in one allocation. Cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to > + * 2MiB * num_possible_nodes(). > + */ In BPF code, we prefer a different style of multiple line comments: /* PMD_SIZE is really big for some archs. It doesn't make sense to * reserve too much memory in one allocation. Cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to * 2MiB * num_possible_nodes(). */ Other than this, this looks good to me. Acked-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Song > +#if PMD_SIZE <= (1 << 21) > #define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE (PMD_SIZE * num_possible_nodes()) > #else > +#define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE ((1 << 21) * num_possible_nodes()) > +#endif > +#else > #define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE PAGE_SIZE > #endif