On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:01:36 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote:
> > + * void *(*ndo_queue_mem_alloc)(struct net_device *dev, int idx);
> > + * Allocate memory for an RX queue. The memory returned in the form of
> > + * a void * can be passed to ndo_queue_mem_free() for freeing or to
> > + * ndo_queue_start to create an RX queue with this memory.
> > + *
> > + * void (*ndo_queue_mem_free)(struct net_device *dev, void *);
> > + * Free memory from an RX queue.
> > + *
> > + * int (*ndo_queue_start)(struct net_device *dev, int idx, void *);
> > + * Start an RX queue at the specified index.
> > + *
> > + * int (*ndo_queue_stop)(struct net_device *dev, int idx, void **);
> > + * Stop the RX queue at the specified index.
> > */
> > struct net_device_ops {
> > int (*ndo_init)(struct net_device *dev);
> > @@ -1679,6 +1693,16 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> > int (*ndo_hwtstamp_set)(struct net_device *dev,
> > struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *kernel_config,
> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> > + void * (*ndo_queue_mem_alloc)(struct net_device *dev,
> > + int idx);
> > + void (*ndo_queue_mem_free)(struct net_device *dev,
> > + void *queue_mem);
> > + int (*ndo_queue_start)(struct net_device *dev,
> > + int idx,
> > + void *queue_mem);
> > + int (*ndo_queue_stop)(struct net_device *dev,
> > + int idx,
> > + void **out_queue_mem);
>
> The queue configuration object was quite an integral part of the design,
> I'm slightly worried that it's not here :)
That was a bit of a simplification I'm making since we just want to
restart the queue. I thought it was OK to define some minimal version
here and extend it later with configuration? Because in this context
all we really need is to restart the queue, yes?
If extending with some configuration is a must please let me know what
configuration struct you're envisioning. Were you envisioning a stub?
Or some real configuration struct that we just don't use at the
moment? Or one that we use for this use case somehow?
> Also we may want to rename
> the about-to-be-merged ops from netdev_stat_ops and netdev_queue_ops,
> and add these there?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240306195509.1502746-2-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
Yeah, that sounds reasonable! Thanks! We could also keep the
netdev_stat_ops and add new netdev_queue_ops alongside them if you
prefer.
> Very excited to hear that you made progress on this and ported GVE over!
Actually, we're still discussing but it looks like my GVE queue API
implementation I proposed earlier may be a no-go. Likely someone from
the GVE team will follow up here with this piece, probably in a
separate series.
For now I'm carrying my POC for the GVE implementation out of tree
with the rest of the driver changes:
https://github.com/mina/linux/commit/501b734c80186545281e9edb1bf313f5a2d8cbee
--
Thanks,
Mina
