Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, docs: Use IETF format for field definitions in instruction-set.rst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri,  1 Mar 2024 14:23:37 -0800 you wrote:
> In preparation for publication as an IETF RFC, the WG chairs asked me
> to convert the document to use IETF packet format for field layout, so
> this patch attempts to make it consistent with other IETF documents.
> 
> Some fields that are not byte aligned were previously inconsistent
> in how values were defined.  Some were defined as the value of the
> byte containing the field (like 0x20 for a field holding the high
> four bits of the byte), and others were defined as the value of the
> field itself (like 0x2).  This PR makes them be consistent in using
> just the values of the field itself, which is IETF convention.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] bpf, docs: Use IETF format for field definitions in instruction-set.rst
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4e73e1bc1abf

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux